Subscribe now and watch my free trend following VIDEO.

Momentum is Everywhere…

Recent article on momentum:

***

There is a vast body of evidence demonstrating that stock returns exhibit momentum — that is, stocks that have done well over the past year tend to continue to do well. And there’s evidence that the momentum premium exists almost everywhere we look, in both U.S. and international stocks (with the notable exception of Japan). There’s also academic research demonstrating that momentum exists in commodity and foreign exchange markets as well. The authors of the 2012 paper, “Momentum in Government-Bond Markets,” studied the period 1987-2011 to determine if momentum existed in these assets. For six countries — Australia, Canada, Germany, Japan, the U.K., and the U.S — they formed long-short portfolios, going long a particular bond maturity if the excess return of the bonds over cash was positive for the previous month and shorting otherwise. For each country they considered three maturity buckets: 1-3 years, 5-7 years and 7-10 years. They subtracted the LIBOR cash return to arrive at the “excess” return. Rebalancing was done monthly. The strategy is easily implementable using highly liquid futures markets. The benchmark is the currency-hedged Citigroup World Government Bond Index. The following is a summary of their findings:

  • Momentum strategies are profitable, generating annual excess returns over LIBOR of between 0.70 and 2.6 percent, and they do so with low volatility (1 percent to 3.6 percent).
  • Australia, with the least liquid of the six markets studied, exhibited the lowest returns to momentum strategies. The three most liquid markets — U.S., Japan and Germany –are the best for momentum strategies. Thus, greater liquidity doesn’t seem detrimental to momentum strategies (and trading costs are the lowest in the most liquid markets).
  • The strategy doesn’t rely on falling interest rates. However, “choppy” markets without direction are detrimental to performance, and returns can be episodic.
  • The excess profits generated are more than sufficient to cover transactions costs as the government bond markets are very liquid.
  • Momentum returns are particularly strong during periods of poor performance for credit markets. Thus, momentum strategies provide some diversification benefit against bond strategies that seek exposure to credit (default) risk.

The authors tested the diversification benefits by combining a 20 percent momentum strategy with an 80 percent Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index allocation, with monthly rebalancing. The simulated portfolio generated excess returns of 0.35 percent a year while reducing volatility — the standard deviation fell 0.40 percent. Investors who take credit risk in their bond allocations should consider adding a momentum strategy. This diversification benefited provided by momentum strategies also applies to investors in value stocks. Because momentum is negatively correlated with the value premium, adding momentum to a value-tilted portfolio improves risk-adjusted returns. While there is a logical risk-based explanation for the existence of the stock, small-cap and value-stock premiums, there is none for momentum — only a behavioral story. Yet, despite the fact that there is no risk-based explanation and that the existence of momentum has been known for decades (thus it would seem that it should have been arbitraged away), momentum persists virtually everywhere we look.

***

Otherwise known as trend following.


How can you move forward immediately to Trend Following profits? My books and my Flagship Course and Systems are trusted options by clients in 70+ countries.

Also jump in:

Trend Following Podcast Guests
Frequently Asked Questions
Performance
Research
Markets to Trade
Crisis Times
Trading Technology
About Us

Trend Following is for beginners, students and pros in all countries. This is not day trading 5-minute bars, prediction or analyzing fundamentals–it’s Trend Following.

Where To Start in Trend Following…

Feedback in:

Hi Michael Covel, my name is [name] and I graduated from Rutgers University last year with a BA in Mathematics and Economics. I have been following your podcast and have read a couple of your books and am very interested in pursuing a career in trend following. I was always disenchanted with the investment banking paradigm, but really believe in the power of trend following. I have been following the markets for the past 5 years and have invested some of my own money during that time. What are some good ways for a guy just starting out to get his foot in the door in this industry? I believe the experience that comes with working for an experienced trend follower would be invaluable. I look forward to hearing from you soon.

Read Linchpin by Seth Godin.

Read Atlas Shrugged.

Read Jack Schwager’s Market Wizard books.

Read my four books.

Listen to all podcast episodes.

Knock on doors if you want a job.

If you want to be a trend trader? Get a system and start trading.

Short list–lots of advice.

Note: Be prepared to never be hired by a trend trader. Then what? Back to my list. You can also consider other options here.


How can you move forward immediately to Trend Following profits? My books and my Flagship Course and Systems are trusted options by clients in 70+ countries.

Also jump in:

Trend Following Podcast Guests
Frequently Asked Questions
Performance
Research
Markets to Trade
Crisis Times
Trading Technology
About Us

Trend Following is for beginners, students and pros in all countries. This is not day trading 5-minute bars, prediction or analyzing fundamentals–it’s Trend Following.

Plays?

This email just came in:

Please forgive me if this may seem ignorant, but do you call out plays with your subscription service?

What do you mean?

Additional Note: Yes, I know what he meant, but I wanted to hear him explain it. My firm teaches clients how to make the plays, not trust gurus. The propaganda machine of how you are supposed to do it is alive and well. Plays…


How can you move forward immediately to Trend Following profits? My books and my Flagship Course and Systems are trusted options by clients in 70+ countries.

Also jump in:

Trend Following Podcast Guests
Frequently Asked Questions
Performance
Research
Markets to Trade
Crisis Times
Trading Technology
About Us

Trend Following is for beginners, students and pros in all countries. This is not day trading 5-minute bars, prediction or analyzing fundamentals–it’s Trend Following.

Diversification is Key to Trend Following

Feedback:

Hey Mike, I was thinking about your recent podcast where you talked about how the sharks were posting Bill Dunn’s worst years to demonstrate the failure of trading. It reminded me of the recent articles on John Paulson. You may have read that his gold fund is doing horribly this year. Down 65%. Just like with Bill Dunn, people who don’t understand trading are just salivating over this demonstration of the “failure of trading”. The fund only represents 2% of Paulson’s funds. If this fund operates totally independently of his others funds then I might be inclined to agree with some of the criticism Mike. I can’t understand how any professional trader of Paulson’s caliber could allow his fund to lose 65% of assets. Also, I can’t understand why any professional trader could have looked at a gold chart for the past few years and decide to go long which is the only way that I can imagine that he could be down 65%. If he does incorporate counter trending strategies and was long then I don’t understand why his stops didn’t prevent such a massive loss. On the other hand Mike, if this fund does not operate totally independent, but operates as part of all of his assets, then my view would be totally different. A 2% investment of total funds under management while a bit high, is not a totally unreasonable amount for a professional to risk on a trade. Furthermore if that is the case, just think about it Mike. A 65% unrealized loss on a particular trade means you’re still in the trade. We are actually willing to risk 100% of the 1% or so that we risk on each trade. I don’t think some people realize that. If you have $100,000 trading account and you risk $1000, 65% down in that trade means you are still in the trade. The trade doesn’t end until you either get stopped at a 100% loss of the $1,000 or you take profits of 2:1 or 3:1 on that trade. Some people don’t seem to realize that about trading.

Confusion here.

65% loss on one market is not trend following! Where is the cutting of loss? Dunn’s drawdown was from taking many small losses across many markets. They add up. No one drop on one market. Plus there really can’t be a trend following fund on one market alone. That means no diversification and that is a recipe for failure.


How can you move forward immediately to Trend Following profits? My books and my Flagship Course and Systems are trusted options by clients in 70+ countries.

Also jump in:

Trend Following Podcast Guests
Frequently Asked Questions
Performance
Research
Markets to Trade
Crisis Times
Trading Technology
About Us

Trend Following is for beginners, students and pros in all countries. This is not day trading 5-minute bars, prediction or analyzing fundamentals–it’s Trend Following.

A Debate on Trend Following

A recent email exchange:

Name: Reading “The Talent Code” by Daniel Coyle. A superb book, I wonder if you know it. On the subject of TF may I also suggest you to consider a podcast with Gary Anderson (The Janus Factor). His work is superb because he has developed a way on knowing when to use tf tools or when to be a mean reverting contrarian. We know that TF does not always work: to know WHEN it offer a different edge. I really believe you should talk with him.

Covel: So all those drawdowns taken by some very smart and successful TFs over the decades were all in vane? They could have avoided them all by switching out at the exact right time to another strategy?

Name: Not 100% but to a certain extent it would seem so. Before you dismiss the idea, have a look at his papers / work. You can measure momentum for leaders and laggards separately; then you calculate the spread in relative performance, some sort of relative strength between 2 equity lines: one for a portfolio with only leaders and one with only laggards. Say from the universe of all commodities you look at the top 20% and bottom 20%. TF has its own cycles, they are not of fixed length clearly but its feature, positive feedback, can be measured. This is another level of analysis not seen in the Turtle work: having a plan, having a broad universe of asset classes, normalizing risk, adjusting risk is all a way to mitigate the inherent volatility of trend following. Anderson’s work has, so far, since 2003, limited to stock but there is no reason not to apply to commodities. Consider this: TF works like a peach until it breaks, then it starts to work again. Maybe the WHY cannot be explained but the WHEN, in reasonable terms, can be calculated, plotted and, possibly, integrated in a TF portfolio. Can you remember how from March 2009 the market has gone up overall but it was led by the laggards? Applying TF to stocks would not have generated good profits or even losses (what I call a “dirty” trend, where reversals are deep and costly for TF). Nowhere in the TF work I have done I have seen this interesting concept. Food for thought.

Covel: At first blush if tomorrow can’t be predicted the idea of a money making system that shifts gears such as you propose … would be novel. I would wonder why all the big names over the years have not been available to invent such a fool proof system? And beyond academic efforts, does a track record exist to show this bi-polar trading system in action?

Name: I am working to see if there is a way to use this “technology”. Tomorrow cannot predicted but you can reasonably sure that it is not going to go very far from where you are. There is a gradual transition from TF to MR and that can be measured – the HOW one implements the idea is another matter. Anderson has been working on stocks. No there is no track record.Consider this: work on relative strength goes back to the 60s with Levi’s paper. Only now there is widespread acceptance of momentum. It took ages to dismantle the idea of EMH. Anderson is trying to show / describe why and when TF (momentum) is “shape shifting”. It is a fascinating subject. And Levi’s work was snubbed from academia if you remember. Original ideas take time to establish, to be accepted. In any environment. You are showing yourself that TF works with numbers and yet very few out there are adopting it. It is what someone called one of those “mysteries of life”.

Covel: Good luck here. I would read Taleb’s work, consult with TFs who have come before us, objectively analyze why TF works, and maybe not try to reinvent the wheel.

Name: First I did not say that one could exactly know when to switch from TF to MR. There is of course some lag but what is interesting, is the persistence of a particular “state” until it changes again. I cannot say that TF drawdowns were in “vane” because either they recognized the problem and accepted to go with it anyway by sticking with their strategy no matter what (a-la Dunn) or they have tried to reduce the impact of the rotation between positive and negative feedback by adjusting risk and market exposure by calculating correlation coefficients to change the mix. Also adding more and more markets, reducing exposure when all the markets are working too much too nicely (a sign that risk has gone up too much), or simply by decreasing risk during drawdowns. ALL these methods address the problem from a different point of view without necessarily asking the question: is TF working NOW, is there a way to see if the lack of performance in leaders and laggards from a TF can be distilled in an indicator to warn… I have added some of his work available on internet for you to see and ponder. It’s your call.

Covel: What is the problem? The idea of a drawdown is the problem? Losing any money is the problem? What do you mean by “impact of rotation between positive and negative feedback”? A loss? BTW Connie Brown dodged my podcast. MTA really needs to clean up the hocus pocus on the train!

Name: I agree with that 150% – you know I dislike “normal” TA. But it is YOUR fault! You are going to someone that a.) is not systematic, b.) she uses EWaves, c.) she makes “calls”. Basically your are asking the right questions to the wrong person. Unless you are deliberately an agent provocateur with technicians. My humble suggestion is to interview those technicians that are systematic like Kirkpatrick. Connie Brown is the exact opposite. But you already knew that.

Covel: Yeah, but if the people in MTA let that nonsense in, on their boards, etc. — what value is CMT/MTA?

Addendum for everyone: Yes, that last sentence may be controversial, but tell me how my thought goes in the wrong direction?

Related Content

Next Level thinking by Faulkner

Fascinating Work

Mark Kritzman Interview

A Fresh Start

Morgan Stanley Hit and Run


How can you move forward immediately to Trend Following profits? My books and my Flagship Course and Systems are trusted options by clients in 70+ countries.

Also jump in:

Trend Following Podcast Guests
Frequently Asked Questions
Performance
Research
Markets to Trade
Crisis Times
Trading Technology
About Us

Trend Following is for beginners, students and pros in all countries. This is not day trading 5-minute bars, prediction or analyzing fundamentals–it’s Trend Following.

Not My Trend Following Role

Feedback in:

Hi, my name is [name] I have just discovered your books on trend following and I am a trend follower myself. I am currently trying to look for registered investment advisers who use your trend following approach and I was wondering if you had any names of people. It seems like the ones that you have in your books are people who invest more in commodities and futures. I am looking for someone who is more into equities, bonds, that sort of thing. If you could give me a call back I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks.

No leads. Not my role. Bottom line, trend following is a strategy. In that strategic spectrum there are traders employing trend following across stocks, futures, commodities, etc.


How can you move forward immediately to Trend Following profits? My books and my Flagship Course and Systems are trusted options by clients in 70+ countries.

Also jump in:

Trend Following Podcast Guests
Frequently Asked Questions
Performance
Research
Markets to Trade
Crisis Times
Trading Technology
About Us

Trend Following is for beginners, students and pros in all countries. This is not day trading 5-minute bars, prediction or analyzing fundamentals–it’s Trend Following.

Ep. 152: Dan Andrews Interview with Michael Covel on Trend Following Radio

Dan Andrews
Dan Andrews

My guest today is Dan Andrews, the founder of The Lifestyle Business podcast. He is the host of the Tropical MBA.

The topic is entrepreneurship, travel and lifestyle.

In this episode of Trend Following Radio we discuss:

  • Location independence
  • Optimizing for time and mobility
  • Andrews’ beginnings as a teenager to where he is today
  • Artists and entrepreneurs
  • Andrews’ beginnings
  • How being in an entirely different atmosphere can bring out your creativity
  • How Paris in the 1920’s relates to the creative explosion in Asia
  • The importance of having a blog and telling your story
  • Why people need stories and ideas to follow
  • Telling a story with your business
  • The importance of “starting” and the iterative process
  • Your brand, and the nature of how you interact with people
  • Thinking you know how to “do it” before you know how the “soup” is made
  • How hard work means so much more than talent
  • Self-control, self-discipline
  • “Failing forward” and getting used to taking emotional risks
  • Hyper-globalization of small businesses
  • The revolution of podcasting
  • Distractions, laziness, and doing an inventory on your time

Listen to this episode:

Jump in!