Subscribe now and watch my free trend following VIDEO.

Blog

CNN Bias: Ali Velshi

Let’s be frank: Anyone giving a view to a significant audience is obliged to be truthful. Now, consider this excerpt from CNN today…noting the “angle” (and that’s being nice) that CNN reporter Ali Velshi takes:

KEITH MCCULLOUGH (GUEST ON CNN): I think what’s happening in Europe is just a preview as to what’s going to happen in the U.S. It all basically starts with debt. So if you believe as a government official that you can solve the problems that are anchored in debt with more debt you are going to end up with the same problems that the Europeans are facing. And I think that we are three to six months away from that coming home to roost here in the U.S.

VELSHI (CNN ANCHOR): Why is it that lots of people go out of their way, Keith, to tell us how the U.S. is not the same as Europe? Our debt issues are certainly are not the same as Greece’s, as Italy’s, as Portugal’s, why are you suggesting that we will get into the same pickle?

MCCULLOUGH: At the end of the day from a deficit perspective, the U.S. — the deficit as a percentage of your GDP is exactly like Greece. It’s going to be pushing close to 12 percent. And anytime we have an issue, like today, for example, with the jobs report what is the answer? The answer is more government, more government spending which is going to simply keep pushing that deficit?

VELSHI: Hold on. What are you talking about? When you have a jobs report like this week, the answer is more government, more government spending? Where did you hear that from? We’ve been discussing that endlessly. That has not been anyone’s suggestion.

MCCULLOUGH: Well I think that that is definitely going to be the suggestion. If you look at this mornings …

VELSHI: Keith, this isn’t an opportunity to just come up on TV and bash government. What are you talking about?

MCCULLOUGH: This morning’s number, if you look at the job ads, 400,000 of them were government-hired workers.

VELSHI: So no one has come out and said, oh my god, let’s have 800,000 government jobs next month. Everybody has said, this is not the way we actually want things to go. We want more private sector hiring. Christine, have you heard one person telling you that this is fantastic; we should have more government hiring? I don’t know what Keith is talking about.

VELSHI: I don’t understand what your premise is, Keith, because that’s not the answer. What should we be doing differently?

MCCULLOUGH: Well the answer will be, from a political perspective, that is a forecast, Ali. That is a forecast. That is what government’s do that have problems, they spend more and more money, taxpayer money to hire.

More from the transcript:

MCCULLOUGH: I think that, look, the market’s ganging up on the three of you because at the end of the day the market doesn’t lie, politicians and people do. And the American government said they were going to solve this than you can go do that. But risk management Ali, starts with watching what the market is telling you.

VELSHI: I hope the market is as cruel to me next year as it was last year. I hope I suffer through another 70 percent gain in the broader markets, Keith. If that’s your biggest plague that you wish on me, I’ll take it.

Consider those last few sentences of arrogance from Velshi as you read the stats that he forgot to mention:

The S&P 500 (SPX) closed on 5/22/2000 at 1400.72 and closed on Friday 5/28/2010 at 1089.41. That is a 22.2% loss in value in ten years of buy and hold investing not allowing for inflation. That means a buy and hold investor lost 22.2% of their money plus another 20% for inflation — a 42% haircut. The period of history the buy and hold advocates really don’t want you to know about is 1929 to 1954. The highest close for the Dow was 381.17 on 9/3/1929 before the beginning of the great bear market, and it took 25 years to get back to ‘even’ on a nominal basis (not counting inflation). The Dow closed above 381 for the first time on 11/23/1954 after the 9/3/1929 high.”

Does Velshi seem like an honest guy as he yucks it up about “suffering through a 70% gain” while failing to mention the real stats [the real stats of buying and holding being underwater for over 10 years]? No, he doesn’t. Is he the type of guy who should be educating anyone about money and markets? Clearly not. As a teacher, I resent Velshi’s reckless use of a CNN megaphone to preach to many who surely don’t know that he is full of it.

***

One reader responded to my comments above by saying:

Isn’t what you’ve written below libelous (not to mention an unnecessary personal attack)? ‘Does Velshi seem like an honest guy as he yucks it up about “suffering through a 70% gain” while failing to mention the real stats? No, he doesn’t.’

The libel is? The personal attack is? The unnecessary part is?

Since you have thrown out a very specific and unfounded attack against me (libel), and since you have failed to back your view in any way, it is assumed that you agree with Velshi (that is unless you correct my assumption).

With Velshi tossing out that 70% line he is saying clearly:

1. That he made that 70%.
2. That he is a buy and holder.

So if he is a buy and holder, and he says he made 70% while ignoring the prior 10 years where all buy and holders are still underwater — he is manipulative at best. Or, and I guess this is possible, perhaps Velshi perfectly timed the bottom from March 09 to May 10 and that’s how he made his 70%? And if he is this wonderful market timer, capable of nailing bottoms and tops perfectly, where is this all disclosed?

When someone appears on TV regularly to large audiences, when they preach money and markets, and when they make the statements Velshi does, I stand by my view. The fact that you are remotely sympathetic with Velshi, and since you seemingly see nothing wrong with what he is doing, you make my point better than I ever could.

Recommended Trend Following Podcasts and Articles

Trend Following Portfolio

Matt Smith Interview

50 year buy and hold

Trend Following Stocks

Trend Following Book Review

Billionaire Words


How can you move forward immediately to Trend Following profits? My books and my Flagship Course and Systems are trusted options by clients in 70+ countries.

Also jump in:

Trend Following Podcast Guests
Frequently Asked Questions
Performance
Research
Markets to Trade
Crisis Times
Trading Technology
About Us

Trend Following is for beginners, students and pros in all countries. This is not day trading 5-minute bars, prediction or analyzing fundamentals–it’s Trend Following.

Survivorship Bias: An Academic Charade to Ignore Trend Following

From Wikipedia:

“Survivorship bias is the logical error of concentrating on the people or things that “survived” some process and ignoring those that didn’t.”

From the Wikipedia entry on me:

“Critics of Covel point out that his studies do not address survivorship bias.”

I challenge anyone to show me where the trend following failures are not outlined in my second book (as but one example). Not only are they outlined, the “whys” are explored.

Bottom line, if you are going to raise the flag of survivorship bias when discussing trend following, like Jim Cramer protégé David Merkel, you need to name those exact failures and outline the reasons for failure. Just saying there were failures, without being specific to anything, is a charade.


How can you move forward immediately to Trend Following profits? My books and my Flagship Course and Systems are trusted options by clients in 70+ countries.

Also jump in:

Trend Following Podcast Guests
Frequently Asked Questions
Performance
Research
Markets to Trade
Crisis Times
Trading Technology
About Us

Trend Following is for beginners, students and pros in all countries. This is not day trading 5-minute bars, prediction or analyzing fundamentals–it’s Trend Following.

The 50 year Forecast? Ahem… Bullsh**

Feedback in:

“Dear Michael Covel, I’m a financial professional analyzing the financial markets of any type. I’m working free, not dependent to ant company or institution. During last 6 months, I aware of an important formation taking place in DOW. It’s the long term SHOULDER-HEAD-SHOULDER formation which will lead DOW to fall down well below 5,000 assumably 1,000 to 2,000 band within two years or three. I’m not sure how to read this decline and its consiquences [sic], which is very sharp, the second after 1929, maybe the first of its kind. It certainly lead to a crisis by affecting first USA markets and then soon the rest of the world. With this decline, DOW will reach the lower line of the “increasing trend path or band of all time” (100 years) and then a new era will start, and DOW will reach 10,000 points again in 10-15 years of time, and then it will reach 100,000 within next 50 years. Note that this is just a forecast,as hundred thousands of analyst doing every day, but this is of its kind and a bit different then usual when you think of time span and its possible effects. Wait and see, test and prove my view with no doubt it will happen. Friendly speaking, I want to convert this forecast into cash. (It’s just a forecast before it occurs).That’s why writing to you. I think Soros fund management is the right place to make use of this info into cash in most effective way possible. Dear Michael, I appreciate if you share this forecast with George Soros himself.”
Best Regards,
Cemal, S.

I love crazy people. Can his prediction happen? Sure. Is there any system that he has to get to that forecast beyond making it up? No.


How can you move forward immediately to Trend Following profits? My books and my Flagship Course and Systems are trusted options by clients in 70+ countries.

Also jump in:

Trend Following Podcast Guests
Frequently Asked Questions
Performance
Research
Markets to Trade
Crisis Times
Trading Technology
About Us

Trend Following is for beginners, students and pros in all countries. This is not day trading 5-minute bars, prediction or analyzing fundamentals–it’s Trend Following.

Financial Literacy: Not on the Horizon

Just saw this headline and article from Associated Press:

New financial rules might not prevent next crisis. Sweeping financial overhaul will change many rules, but loopholes could allow another crisis.

When you read that you are left with one of two choices:

1. The author(s) have no idea what they are talking about.
2. The author(s) are purposefully not telling the truth.

Bubbles (read: “crisis”) are a part of human condition. They will never be eliminated. Government rules will NEVER keep human beings from building financial bubbles. Why is this such a simple concept to outline, but seemingly beyond the comprehension of all journalists?


How can you move forward immediately to Trend Following profits? My books and my Flagship Course and Systems are trusted options by clients in 70+ countries.

Also jump in:

Trend Following Podcast Guests
Frequently Asked Questions
Performance
Research
Markets to Trade
Crisis Times
Trading Technology
About Us

Trend Following is for beginners, students and pros in all countries. This is not day trading 5-minute bars, prediction or analyzing fundamentals–it’s Trend Following.

Mikhail Prokhorov on too Much Information and Why Snowflakes Have No Relevance to Trading Succes

Feedback in:

“Hi Michael, do you think that hidden divergence is a good indicator of trend continuation after a retracement? Thanks in advance.”
Regards,
Jeff

Jeff, exact definitions of ‘hidden divergence’, ‘trend continuation’ and ‘retracement’?

“Hidden divergence is defined as follows (from http://www.babypips.com/school/hidden_divergence.html): If price is making a higher low (HL), but the oscillator is making a lower low (LL), this is considered hidden bullish divergence. If price is making a lower high (LH), but the oscillator is making a higher high (HH), then you have hidden bearish divergence. In a market that trends in a particular overall direction, the main trend is typically punctuated by periods where the market goes in the opposite direction of the main trend (forgive me if this is stating the obvious). ‘Retracement’ is when the market goes in the opposite direction to that of the main trend, and ‘trend continuation’ is a return to that main trend following a retracement.

Jeff, I am not sure how it is all relevant to trend following!

“Fair enough! Incidentally, do you think this difficulty in translating into mathematical formulas what is obvious to the human eye might explain why hedge funds haven’t sacked their technical analysts and replaced them with computers? :)”

In my book I talk about predictive and reactive technical analysis. The later is trend following. The former is BS. Some, just like BS. 🙂

“I’ve just had a look at your book. Is the distinction that predictive TA looks at things like Fibonacci numbers and Elliott waves, whereas reactive TA is simply interested in jumping onto an existing trend and staying with it until it shows signs of coming to an end?”

I like my explanations better, but I think you get it.

“I read a book called Trading Chaos a while back, in which the authors talked about physics and the prevalence of fractals in nature. It was all very interesting, but I struggle to see the relevance of the properties of a snowflake to any market, either brick or virtual!”

There is no relevance! This conversation with a reader of mine reminded me of a recent article about the new owner of the Nets: Mikhail Prokhorov. Prokhorov has told the world that he avoids the internet:

“I don’t use a computer. We have too much information and it’s really impossible to filter it.”

Bill Simmons, in his article on ESPN, adds:

“You know what? He’s not necessarily wrong. Do we REALLY need all this information? Like, right now — you’re reading this column and hopefully enjoying it, but ultimately, could you have survived the weekend if you missed it? I say yes. Just about everything online fits that mold — you have to sift through loads of bad writing and irrelevant information to find the occasional entertaining/funny/interesting thing, and even then, it’s not something that’s making or breaking your week. Ever been on a vacation and had little-to-no Internet access that week? You survived, right? Maybe the big Russian is on to something.”

Exactly. Isn’t that paragraph a great explanation as to why purveyors of too much analysis…are [expletive]? Its a great endorsement of trend following.


How can you move forward immediately to Trend Following profits? My books and my Flagship Course and Systems are trusted options by clients in 70+ countries.

Also jump in:

Trend Following Podcast Guests
Frequently Asked Questions
Performance
Research
Markets to Trade
Crisis Times
Trading Technology
About Us

Trend Following is for beginners, students and pros in all countries. This is not day trading 5-minute bars, prediction or analyzing fundamentals–it’s Trend Following.

The Markets as ‘The Truman Show’

An excerpt I like:

“The Truman Show is a 1998 American comedy-drama…The film chronicles the life of a man who discovers he is living in a constructed reality soap opera, televised 24/7 to billions across the globe.”

Constructed reality soap opera? Our markets today!

Bottom line, from a trend trading perspective — price is king and follow it. But from a “what-the-hell-is-going-on-in-the-world-today” perspective — it is ‘The Truman Show’


How can you move forward immediately to Trend Following profits? My books and my Flagship Course and Systems are trusted options by clients in 70+ countries.

Also jump in:

Trend Following Podcast Guests
Frequently Asked Questions
Performance
Research
Markets to Trade
Crisis Times
Trading Technology
About Us

Trend Following is for beginners, students and pros in all countries. This is not day trading 5-minute bars, prediction or analyzing fundamentals–it’s Trend Following.

The Magazine Indicator

In the last few weeks the media has gone ‘all in’ on recovery. All is rosy. The Dow is up. Good times are back! And when the media goes all in many love to point out (me included) that the magazine cover indicator is often great contrary evidence to where we are really headed.

That said, the cover indicator is more fun than substance. Meaning, trend followers don’t build into their technical trend following systems the cover indicator. So it sounds great, and the psychology behind it makes sense, and sometimes it works out, but if the numbers of your system don’t say to do something — sitting still is the best course of action.


How can you move forward immediately to Trend Following profits? My books and my Flagship Course and Systems are trusted options by clients in 70+ countries.

Also jump in:

Trend Following Podcast Guests
Frequently Asked Questions
Performance
Research
Markets to Trade
Crisis Times
Trading Technology
About Us

Trend Following is for beginners, students and pros in all countries. This is not day trading 5-minute bars, prediction or analyzing fundamentals–it’s Trend Following.