## Algorithms and Decision-Making

Feedback in:

Hi Michael,

You talked about computers and algorithms in a recent podcast.

I just listened to a talk by Brian Christian for the Long Now foundation about using algorithms to support our decision making. Not necessarily using a computer, but rather to help our thinking and decision making process. A great talk which touches on similar issues. I’d love to hear you interview him some time.

Brian Christian is the co-author of “Algorithms to Live By: The Computer Science of Human Decisions”.

Cheers,
[Name]

Thanks! Looks like a good guest.

## Too Much Data Is Toxic–Trend Followers Get This Terribly Important Principle Deep in Their Gut

An excerpt (source):

In business and economic decision-making, data causes severe side effects —data is now plentiful thanks to connectivity; and the share of spuriousness in the data increases as one gets more immersed into it. A not well discussed property of data: it is toxic in large quantities —even in moderate quantities.

More:

The more frequently you look at data, the more noise you are disproportionally likely to get (rather than the valuable part called the signal); hence the higher the noise to signal ratio. And there is a confusion, that is not psychological at all, but inherent in the data itself. Say you look at information on a yearly basis, for stock prices or the fertilizer sales of your father-in-law’s factory, or inflation numbers in Vladivostock. Assume further that for what you are observing, at the yearly frequency the ratio of signal to noise is about one to one (say half noise, half signal) —it means that about half of changes are real improvements or degradations, the other half comes from randomness. This ratio is what you get from yearly observations. But if you look at the very same data on a daily basis, the composition would change to 95% noise, 5% signal. And if you observe data on an hourly basis, as people immersed in the news and markets price variations do, the split becomes 99.5% noise to .5% signal. That is two hundred times more noise than signal —which is why anyone who listens to news (except when very, very significant events take place) is one step below sucker.

More:

To conclude, the best way to mitigate interventionism is to ration the supply of information, as naturalistically as possible. This is hard to accept in the age of the internet. It has been very hard for me to explain that the more data you get, the less you know what’s going on, and the more iatrogenics you will cause.

Trend followers tackle the issues raised by Taleb by making their trading decisions off the market price. Boom–one piece of data for all of your trading decisions–price.

Article Source: Ritholtz.com.

Learn to be a trend following trader.