Blog

An article titled Negatively Skewed Trading Strategies (PDF) by Glyn A. Holton is definitely worth reading. Well said. For those not following the logic here completely, take a read of Chapter 4 and 8 of Trend Following.

Some feedback on above report:

Michael: When I used to own an FCM, we had a saying for option premium sellers, “they ate like birds and shit like elephants”. And they scared the crap out of us. Regards, Jack Zaner.

Thanks, Jack. Sometimes the short and simple sentence best describes it all!

Theresa Lo offered a nice comment on price:

“I know you’re used to reading financial blogs that opine ad nauseum everyday. I have no idea how they do it, nor am I going to try. You see, I show up each morning to make money; cash facilitates life. I don’t care for conspiracy theories or consider fiat currency an Ayn Rand moral dilemma. I won’t waste time tracking the defunct M3. Who cares if the Plunge Protection Team is real or not? @*$%@#$ corporate greed. I cannot right the alleged wrongs of capitalism – that’s what the SELL button is for. Use it. I simply accept the Darwinian nature of the markets. There is a financial circle of life and it cannot be defied. There is no good or bad. There are only profits or losses. That’s why tracking and trading price is the way to go. In an imperfect world, it’s all we have.”

Barry Ritholtz adds a great comment on his blog:

“We could merely guess – and all these calls for buying big cap tech stocks in the face of declining stock prices, decreasing P/E multiples, and rapid commoditization of their products have been nothing more than blind guesses. However, we find it is much more advantageous to wait until a given stock, sector, index or market proves itself before leaping into the fray. This is an admittedly humble approach (surprised?). We acknowledge that the future is unknown, that us Humans are particularly bad at conjecturing what lies ahead, and that most people on Wall Street refuse to acknowledge this. We confess to having no idea what the hell is going to happen even next year. Will the GOP lose control of Congress? Will bird flu kill millions? Will Iraq get even worse? And what about Katharine McPhee – can she win it all on American Idol? We own up to having no clue about any of these burning issues. And neither, we must tell you, does anyone else. So rather than merely speculate, we would rather allow a given sector to develop on its own. When we got bullish on Oil in December 2003, crude had broken out over $30, and was heading higher. Similarly, our calls on US Equities post Tax cut in 2003 wasn’t until the technical picture improved. We got bullish on Japan in 2004 when it was apparent that it had started to work; Those who were merely “guessers” had 15 years to get it wrong. Our bullishness on Gold was for similar technical reasons – after a long period of under performance it was starting to work also. Regular readers are all too familiar with our expectations for how this bull market ends – an ugly and violent death – but as long as the trend remains up, we are loathe to fight the tape and get short. Indeed, we still are not short any US equities, although we have some in the money VIX options and a few Q puts – as hedges. While we may wax eloquent and muse about what may come eventually, our investments stay on the same side of the market as the overall trend – or at worst, in cash. Once we see proof positive that a stock, sector or market has shifted direction, then we can jump in.”

How can you move forward immediately to Trend Following profits? My books and my Flagship Course and Systems are trusted options by clients in 70+ countries.

Also jump in:

• Trend Following Podcast Guests
• Frequently Asked Questions
• Performance
• Research
• Markets to Trade
• Crisis Times
• Trading Technology
• About Us

Trend Following is for beginners, students and pros in all countries. This is not day trading 5-minute bars, prediction or analyzing fundamentals–it’s Trend Following.

Here is a take on “compounding” from a reseller of the Winton Capital trend following fund:

“There’s a good rule of thumb for estimating realistic returns from equities over time. Take the rate of inflation and add on a risk premium of 3%. With inflation currently at around 2.6%, you could expect returns from equities to be around 6% over the next few years. However, big external shocks can have a significant negative effect on equity markets and there is no guarantee that you will get back what you invest. The Matrix Ascension Plan aims to give you higher returns than equities over the next seven years and capital protection. The Matrix Ascension Plan enables you to benefit from the returns of a Fund managed by Winton Capital Management, a company that has a track record of producing high returns for investors. In October 1997, they launched the Winton Futures Fund which has provided investors with annualised returns of 21.01%. As a comparison,the annualised returns from the FTSE 100 Index over the same period have been 0.28%. To put these returns in some sort of context, if you had been the buyer of Vincent van Gogh’s ‘Irises’ in 1947, you would have paid $80,000. The next time it changed hands, in 1987, it was bought for $53.9m. This seems an extraordinary rise in value but mathematically it shows a compound average annual growth rate of 17.7% – less than the annualised returns from the Winton Futures Fund over the last six and a half years.”

I liked the van Gogh compounding example. It really points out the “magic” of compounding.