Category: Trend Following

I was in Chicago today for the Managed Funds Association’s Forum. The lunch keynote was delivered by Elizabeth Cheval, Chairman, EMC Capital Management, Inc. and was titled ‘Let’s Get Negative! Correlation and the Case for Managed Futures’.

Cheval’s presentation was easily one of the best I have seen in the industry. Tackling a subject like ‘correlation’ and making it user friendly is not easy, but Cheval hit the mark. Some highlights with more to follow in the next week:

1. She framed the conversation in two parts: 1.) Human Investment Psychology and 2.) The Mathematical Solution.

2. The psychology that led to the tech boom/bust influences our portfolios every day. The psychology that led to the tech bubble does not go away and it is still a useful example because it is in reach of short-term memory.

3. She outlined chronocentricity [from this book] or the inborn egotism that one’s own generation is poised on the very cusp of history. Everyone should see why she was speaking of this.

4. Her definition of correlation: the nominal measure of the tendency for two assets to concurrently under perform or over perform their average returns by the same number of standard deviations.

5. You want negative correlation as much as you can get it in your portfolio as long as the components added are positive returns.

Wise feedback:

“Hi Michael, I’m a trader in the Asian Markets and I’ve always been baffled at why many of my colleagues don’t seem to understand how markets work. I just read you book, Trend Following, and now I understand just a little bit why. I have a friend who just finished his CFA examinations recently and after discussing with him my actual trading experiences as well as the ideas in your book, he mentioned that given the way finance is taught nowadays, it’s very possible to pass the CFA examinations and not know the first thing about real, practical, and successful trading. By the way, I keep this quote from William Arthur Ward near my desk, and I think it perfectly captures the essence of trend following and trading. Best Regards, Doc”

“To laugh is to risk appearing a fool,
To weep is to risk appearing sentimental
To reach out to another is to risk involvement,
To expose feelings is to risk exposing your true self
To place your ideas and dreams before a crowd is to risk their loss
To love is to risk not being loved in return,
To hope is to risk despair,
To try is to risk to failure.
But risks must be taken because the greatest hazard in life is to risk nothing.
The person who risks nothing, does nothing, has nothing is nothing.
He may avoid suffering and sorrow,
But he cannot learn, feel, change, grow or live.
Chained by his servitude he is a slave who has forfeited all freedom.
Only a person who risks is free.
The pessimist complains about the wind;
The optimist expects it to change;
And the realist adjusts the sails.”
– William Arthur Ward

More.

---

How can you move forward immediately to Trend Following profits? My books and my Flagship Course and Systems are trusted options by clients in 70+ countries.

Also jump in:

• Trend Following Podcast Guests
• Frequently Asked Questions
• Performance
• Research
• Markets to Trade
• Crisis Times
• Trading Technology
• About Us

Trend Following is for beginners, students and pros in all countries. This is not day trading 5-minute bars, prediction or analyzing fundamentals–it’s Trend Following.

Salem Abraham has been at the trading game for many years now. His track record exceeds 18+ years (PDF). While his performance consistently grows, client restlessness never stops. Clients typically, and this is by no means unique to Abraham, panic at the “bottom” often missing the new equity highs. Study Abraham’s performance. There are key lessons there for all. More on Abraham here (PDF).

David Druz, a trend follower with a lengthy track record, offered this tidbit on his web site:

“The robustness of a trading system is proportional to its volatility. This is the no-free-lunch part. A robust system is one which works and is stable over many types of market conditions and over many timeframes. It works in German Bund futures and it works in Wheat. It works when tested over 1950-1960 or over 1990-2000. Robust systems tend to be designed around successful trading tactics (origin of our “Tactical” name), classical money management techniques, and universal principles of market behavior. These systems are not designed around specific types of markets or market action. And here is the amazing thing about robust systems: The more robust a system, the more volatile it tends to be! This is because robust systems are not optimized to particular markets or market conditions. The converse is also true. You can design systems with excellent returns and low volatility on historical testing, but which work only for given periods in given markets. These systems tend to be curve-fit or market-fit and are not robust. For a system to have the highest odds of profitability over time and markets, the inescapable tradeoff is volatility. Diversification is used of course, but it will only dampen the volatility so much.”

Trend followers put out publicly available documents listing their backgrounds and performance. These are usually interesting to read even if not making an investment with that particular trader. These “disclosure documents” are freely available from the government via Freedom of Information requests and or directly from the trader. Here is one from David Druz.

Disclaimer: I have no business relationship with Druz. I write about what interests me. If you have a good idea for a blog entry here, drop me an email.

Bob Pardo was profiled in the book Market Beaters. Here is an excerpt (PDF) from the book. He also wrote an informative book titled Design, Testing, and Optimization of Trading Systems.

Does Trend Following Work on Stocks? This paper is being released exclusively first on my collection of sites.