More Faulty Logic

This post brought in this feedback attempting to explain why certain opinions should be valued:

“Well, given that some hedge funds go bust, his message is quite credible. When he backs up his opinion with Mr. Volcker’s opinions, he gains additional credibility.”

‘Opinions’ mean more than decades of performance data by systematic traders? Explain that logic to me.

You might like my 2017 epic release: Trend Following: How to Make a Fortune in Bull, Bear and Black Swan Markets (Fifth Edition). Revised and extended with twice as much content.